E-readers may kill my love affair

I’ve been thinking about getting an electronic reader such as a Kindle or a Nook (from Barnes and Noble). But there’s just something about holding a real book in your hands…turning pages and hearing the soft rustle it makes. I’m sure the writers among us will sigh and relate to this love affair with books.

I love the way the black font stands out on the background of softly colored paper. And how the book nestles into my hand, becoming pliable and worn from repeated use.

Yet reading a real book may soon become a guilty pleasure. Being eco-conscious, I realize the very paper of the book involves cutting down trees and uses precious natural resources. I’m resistant to the idea though, of giving up the physical presence of books.

But even as I cling to the thought that I won’t like an e-reader, I’m determined to look into it. Perhaps take one for a test drive and try to have an open mind. I’ll have a few specifications in mind though that the e-reader will need to have…

1. Ability to highlight or bookmark certain pages – I’m an avid learner in many areas. Most of my books are of the reference variety and end up dog-eared with passages highlighted.
2. Easy-to-read – no glare on the screen or strain on my eyes. The reason is, I tend to lose myself for hours on end while reading. I’d hate to give that up due to inability to focus or the dull, throbbing headache which is the by-product of eye strain.
3. The “feel” of a real book – by that I mean it’s of a standard book size and the amount of verbiage on a page is sufficient so I don’t have to keep scrolling or flipping screens. I’m a very fast reader, so that could become annoying quite quickly.
4. Extensive book selections – I admit to being a fan of immediate gratification when it comes to reading books. If there’s one out there that strikes my interest, I want to read it NOW!
5. Reasonably-priced downloads – I wouldn’t mind saving a few bucks on the e-versions.

As I peruse the selections available, I’ll post my findings over the course of the next month or so. If you have suggestions, let me know!

Hoppily,

CB

Look at Shared VALUES, NOT Demographics!

Contrary to what some high-profile marketers suggest, don’t look to standard demographics for an assessment of your audience…

Instead, look at their shared VALUES.

For predicting anyone’s lifestyles, purchasing habits, social concerns, spirituality, etc… typical measurements don’t hold up. 

Standard demographics would have you believe that standards of income are “the key” to insider information on various groups. I can guarantee you that – in today’s highly-sensitive markets – copy falls flat if you use those old models.

Consider there are groups that have widely diverse ranges of income, age, education or occupation – but share similar VALUES.

If you look deeply enough, you’ll discover subcultures within the demographic ranges. Look to a demographic specialist, such as sociologist Paul H. Ray for further illumination on the subsets.  

For example…

“Moderns” don’t rank highly in terms of being on the religious right (as “Heartlands” do).   Where they do rank highest is that they believe in financial materialism (not a bad thing!) and they also rank highest in terms of altruism, or “giving back”.  

This doesn’t mean they’re at odds with the Heartlands demographics. In fact…

Both Heartlands and Moderns agree that they want to rebuild neighborhoods and communities, as well as take a firm stand against violence to women and children.

Here’s a key difference to note which doesn’t appear in traditional demographics:

In terms of relationship-orientation, 55% of Heartlands want a traditional relationship — only 25% of Moderns want their relationships to fall within the established structure.  Good to know if you’re writing copy for the wedding market!

Now, within each of these broad groupings are sub-groupings. This is where the “juicy” stuff comes in…

Here are a few examples of subdivisions within the Modern category –

Economic Conservatives – most affluent segment of Modernists, with a strong work ethic. Likely to oppose ecological sustainability.  

Conventional  – mainstream and more cynical. Dislike both Heartland and Cultural Creatives.

Striving Centers – upward mobility is their main thrust, but also yearn for spiritual meaning.

Alienated Moderns – disillusioned who have lost better-paying jobs or have poor job prospects.

You won’t find that in the occupation/income/ethnic breakdown of standard demographics!

Is this imperative to a business owner or copywriter?  Most certainly!  Almost every business has a “draw” for a specific group. Hot buttons and emotional triggers are tied into peoples’ values.

Other issues to take into consideration could be experiences with alternative health care, love of foreign lands, feminism, pro-social justice, etc….

I’ve highlighted 2 demographic groups but there are others to take into consideration as well.  My favorite demographic to write copy for is the subset of Cultural Creatives, mainly because I fall within those parameters myself.

Save yourself a lot of time and money by digging beyond standard demographics.  Find your TA. Connect with them by research or interviews. (I suggest interviews)   Get enough of a cross-section so you know exactly how to position your marketing.

And…

Have fun with it!

Hoppily yours,

Copy Bunny

P.S.    if you want a great source of info on the Cultural Creatives, email me!  I’ll be glad to send it my fave sources of info to you.